Being Assertive with people who are always right: a case study, part two

I had some great responses from several readers to last week’s case study. So for those of you who were waiting here’s my response.

The most important thing to remember when dealing with people with this kind of mindset is to avoid getting into a power struggle of any sort. This will only end in an unresolved conflict.

I made a point of not answering or challenging his comment about learning, I just let it lie.

I then acknowledged that he had a lot of experience and asked him if he thought people could learn from him. He immediately responded with a clear “yes”.

Now this bit is important!!

I resisted the temptation of pointing out his inconsistency. Instead I asked him if he would help me by attending the course and sharing his experiences. Offering Child to his Parent. He graciously agreed.

The course I was running was called “dealing with difficult customers” and was what is known as a “sheep dip”. It was intended that all staff would attend (around 400 people).  John volunteered for the first workshop.

He chose a seat very near me in the classroom and throughout the day participated well. Sometimes he agreed with me and sometimes he didn’t. Whenever he disagreed with me I allowed him to express his opinion without arguing. I made it clear that all participants had the right to make up their own minds about what they agreed and disagreed with. That only they would know what would work for them. (internal reference invite)

This of course was aimed at John but would sound okay to everyone else too. I wasn’t teaching NLP metaprograms that day however I used my knowledge of them in the way I taught the class. I also pace and lead using Transactional Analysis ego states.

My goal was for him to complete the whole workshop which he did.  The bonus was that while I was teaching ego states he went very quiet and said hardly anything. Perhaps he was internalising something.

At the end of the workshop I asked everyone to complete a “traffic light” action plan based on the day. The “red” light for behaviours they would stop doing, “amber” for what they would continue to do and “green” for new behaviours they would start.

Predictably John’s action plan read:

“Red: Nothing”

“Amber: Everything”

“Green”: Nothing”

This didn’t matter to me because at the end John thanked me for an interesting day and said he had learnt a couple of new things!

For me this interaction is a success, I felt he responded and softened. He had never completed a training course before but on that day he did. He left feeling positive, engaged and with his dignity intact.  In order to influence and communicate well it is important to remember we don’t need others to lose face or to feel we have won a battle.

About Melody @ GWizlearning

Melody spent fourteen years gathering experience of the business world working in banking, telecommunications and the public sector before co-founding The GWiz Learning Partnership in 1993. Melody has a Masters Degree in Applied Positive Psychology, a degree in Psychology and a diploma in Psychotherapy. She is an NLP Master Trainer which allows her to run NLP Practitioner, NLP Master Practitioner and NLP Trainer Training courses certified by the Positive School of Intrinsic Neuro-Linguistc Psychology. She is also a qualified Myers Briggs practitioner and EI practitioner and added to all this is five years Transactional Analysis training, meaning she is able to help organisations access the hidden potential in their staff. She is also in demand for her work in transforming average or even troubled teams into high performers. Melody is a visiting lecturer at University of East London, teaching "Wellbeing and Positive Psychology" to undergraduates. Additionally, she is a member of the CIPD and is ILM accredited. Melody's interests are many and varied. She has a keen interest in personal development, canine and wolf psychology, conservation, movies and running. She also enjoys western horse riding, walking the GWiz dogs, nature watching and stage combat (particularly sword fighting).
This entry was posted in NLP, Personal Development, Transactional analysis and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s